anti muc21 antibody (Novus Biologicals)
Structured Review

Anti Muc21 Antibody, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 6 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti muc21 antibody/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 93 stars, based on 6 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "MUC21 is downregulated in oral squamous cell carcinoma and associated with poor prognosis"
Article Title: MUC21 is downregulated in oral squamous cell carcinoma and associated with poor prognosis
Journal: Frontiers in Oncology
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1767261
Figure Legend Snippet: MUC21 Expression by analyzing high-throughput dataset including Affymetrix GeneChip ® Human Transcriptome Array 2.0(HTA), GSE34105 from GEO and TCGA RNAseq data. (A-F) , the heatmaps of hierarchical clustering and volcano plots of differential gene expressions revealed by HTA based on 10 paired OSCC and adjacent normal oral tissue; GSE34105 based on 62 OSCC and 16 normal oral tissue; TCGA base on 266 OSCC and 19 normal oral tissue. Genes with a fold change >2 and adj-P-value of <0.05 were highlighted. (G, H) the up and down regulated genes in the three datasets were intersected and it was showed that 73 was up and 102 were down regulated in the intersection which comprised only MUC15 and MUC21 from Mucin family. (I) relative expression level (the median of the three datasets) comparison showed that MUC21 was more down regulated than MUC15, the chart was created from Excel (Microsoft ® for Excel). OSCC, oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Techniques Used: Expressing, High Throughput Screening Assay, RNA sequencing, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: MUC21 co expression gene analysis by cor.test of R language in the TCGA. (A-K) , the correlation analysis of MUC21 to SPRR3, MAL, TMPRSS11B, CAPN14, FUT6, CEACAM7, CRNN, DYNAP, IL36A, KRT13, KRT4. R value was set at more than 0.7, and P value was set less than 0.001. (L) , Top five negatively or positively correlated genes were showed in circos map.
Techniques Used: Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: Quantitative qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry analysis of MUC21, KRT4, KRT13, and CRNN in OSCC and para-OSCC. (A-D) showed that MUC21, KRT4, KRT13 and CRNN were down regulated in OSCC than para-OSCC (P< 0.0001), the expression levels were normalized against GAPDH. (E) Spearman correlation analysis showed that MUC21was related with KRT4, KRT13 and CRNN at mRNA level. (F-I) showed that MUC21 and KRT4 were down regulated in OSCC than para-OSCC (P<0.0001); KRT13 was down regulated in OSCC than para-OSCC (P <0.05); and CRNN was also down regulated in OSCC than para-OSCC (P<0.001). (J) Spearman correlation analysis showed that MUC21 was related with KRT4, KRT13 and CRNN at protein level too.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR, Immunohistochemistry, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: MUC21 expression analysis in OSCC and para-OSCC via immunohistochemistry (IHC) and its relation with critical clinical characters. (A) a whole block of OSCC and para-OSCC tissue analyzed by IHC showed that MUC21 was expressed in para-OSCC epithelium and lost in OSCC. (B) MUC21 expression between OSCC and para-OSCC in 102 paired patient samples was quantified by mean optical density (MOD) values. MUC21 decreased significantly in OSCC (P < 0.0001). Box plots represent the median, 25th, and 75th percentiles of the data. (C–H) displayed matched para-OSCC and OSCC. (D, F, H) represented well, moderate, and poor differentiation of OSCC, respectively. Unannotated Scale bar = 100 μm. The Scale bar of the block tissue was 1mm. (I) decreased MUC21 expression level was related with cervical lymphatic metastasis and OSCC differentiation. “pN0” means no lymphatic metastasis, “pN1-PN3” referred to different degrees of lymphatic metastasis; “well +moderate” and “poor” referred to different degrees of differentiation.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Immunohistochemistry, Blocking Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Kaplan–Meier survival analyses for postoperative OSCC patients based on MUC21 expression. (A, B) Overall Survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)with low MUC21 expression were significantly shorter than those with high MUC21 expression (P = 0.012 for OS, P<0.0001 for DFS). (C, D) , Forest map: The univariate analysis of OS and DFS in OSCC patients. (E, F) , Forest map: The multivariate analysis of OS and DFS in OSCC patients.
Techniques Used: Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: In vitro cell lines experiment post overexpression and knockdown of MUC21. (A) MUC21 was significantly overexpressed and knocked down in CAL27 and HN6. (B) CCK-8 assay on CAL27 and HN6 post MUC21 manipulation. (C) Transwell assay without Matrigel coated filter of CAL27 and HN6 post MUC21 manipulation. (D) Transwell assay with Matrigel coated filter of CAL27 and HN6 post MUC21 manipulation. (E) wound-healing assay conducted at 24 hours post MUC21 manipulation in CAL27 and HN6 cells. NC: negative control, SH: MUC21 knockdown, OE: MUC21 overexpression. Statistical significance is denoted by *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001.
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Over Expression, Knockdown, CCK-8 Assay, Transwell Assay, Wound Healing Assay, Negative Control


